yeah, but realistically in what other places would you use them?

Whenever your designer team decides to use that layout. It seems to lend well for social medias (I have been requested to apply it in a non-art social media) and galleries.

from TFA

    uv run ohbin run rg -- TODO src/

yeaaah

> I know some people who are adamantly against solar and wind

let me guess... they sell oil?

Nah, it definitely comes along for the ride. Maybe watch Folding Idea's (lengthy, sorry, he does that) documentary "In Search Of A Flat Earth".

That documentary is about QAnon (not about the "Flat Earth" per se) but it helps you understand that "But that's nonsense" is the point. I call this "Facts Aren't True" because that's the core of the idea. They don't like facts, the facts are uncomfortable, they can make up a better truth which does make them comfortable.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTfhYyTuT44

no, sadly its somehow become part of the global culture war. Fossil is right wing manly dominant power, renewables are woke and womanly and left.

Its all electrons how did we get here jesus.

Do you realize you are part of the global culture war by posting your comment?

Did you know Texas produces more solar energy than California? https://insideclimatenews.org/news/05032026/inside-clean-ene...

Your comment, as appropriate for a culture war is both subtly misleading and also just flat out wrong.

Quote from your own article:

> And if we look at the sum of utility-scale and small-scale solar, California remains ahead.

The more subtle misdirection is obvious from the first sentence:

> Texas, which already leads the country in electricity generation from natural gas, coal and wind, has passed California to become the leader in utility-scale solar.

So they lead on gas, coal, wind and (utility) solar in absolute terms. Which points to them being big and/or power hungry rather than particularly green.

Important to call this out as fans of hands off government highlight Texas as their champion for renewables rollout when they are solidly mid-ranking by percentage. And they had government support for wind under previous Republican governers and all but one federal governments.

> how many more years do I need to work in tech?

The right answer should be "until you are able to do it".

That's the whole premise of welfare. Anything less or more is privilege/vice

Working in tech until you are able to do it is sage advice, but getting employers on board is difficult. Usually being able to do it is a prerequisite to begin working in tech in their eyes.

to spy on you

neither?

While for "simple" diffs these UIs are "fine", I'm still struggling (after 15+ years of search) for a really good tool that could help me with 3-file diffs...

I'm still stuck with (k)diff3, and, while they work, I would really like to a more integrate web interface for my projects

Can you give an example of why you need that? Genuinely curious

git merge conflicts?

Basically you're using AI as very costly linters...

what's wrong with (depending on the language) checkstyle, sonarlint, ruff, mypy, xmllint, and/or eslint?

The quick answer is that even in the workflow described by the author these tools don’t do the same thing AI does. And a good programmer/agent will be using these tools as well

if you're interested on liberliber[1] you can find some of Collodi's works in epub and audiobook formats (in italian)

[1] https://liberliber.it/autori/autori-c/carlo-collodi-alias-ca...