> In terms of languages features, Java is mostly a subset of C++.
Not sure I'd agree with that. It's obviously incorrect in a formal sense, and in an informal sense you could say that feature sets of so many languages overlapped somewhat so that the observation is useless.
Not sure I'd agree with that. It's obviously incorrect in a formal sense, and in an informal sense you could say that feature sets of so many languages overlapped somewhat so that the observation is useless.