Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've heard that one before.

Most foreign agencies would probably take a far more direct route, one they've been using for centuries, and use one of the multiple moles they surely have placed inside of these organizations.



Having a mole is completely different from a system like JWICS being hacked.


If private American communications data finds its way into the hands of foreign intelligence organizations, does it really matter whether the database was "hacked" technically or via traditional espionage? The end result is the same.


Usually when the term hacked is used it's used technically. The end result is the same but it's important to be accurate about the method and means.


Actually, the term hacked is more often used nowadays in social engineering cases since that is how most data breaches occur. Espionage falls firmly under social engineering.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: