You can certainly generalize, and chiropractics is a sham, but if there is some placebo effect or it makes people happy then fine so long as people are well informed then they can choose to go to these quacks if they like. The problem is person having a serious and undiagnosed neurological problem is referred to a chiropractor by an alleged real medical doctor.
Would you feel the same way if a doctor referred a depressed person to see an astrologist or psychic medium or a church? You will easily find thousands of anecdotes from people attesting to those helping them, and you might even find they could statistically help some peoples' mental health whether by placebo or giving them someone to talk to or a group to be part of.
Did you read the parent comment I responded to? Here is someone who is specifically helped by chiropractics. So that it doesn’t work on let’s say 95% doesn’t mean that 5% gets a genuine improvement. The thing is just better knowledge of what chiropractics is useless for and when it makes a genuine difference.
Generalizing that all is a quack/placebo doesn’t help move us forward in such a case. The end conclusion is better information and dissemination to doctors and health practitioners so they know when to refer.
Yes I did, and I disagree with you. Did you read my comment? Anecdotes don't mean that you can't generalize the idea that medical professionals should not refer patients to quacks. If chiropractics has some placebo effect or other effect in some specific cases does not make it okay to refer this serious undiagnosed nerve problems to them, that's just ludicrous.
Would you feel the same way if a doctor referred a depressed person to see an astrologist or psychic medium or a church? You will easily find thousands of anecdotes from people attesting to those helping them, and you might even find they could statistically help some peoples' mental health whether by placebo or giving them someone to talk to or a group to be part of.